Having a bias for action is a great one to have if you want to change the world. Take the next step now – you likely have all the information you need to make the call.
Columnist
Serge van Dam
I am a bigot. There, I said it: I have a deep bias for people and companies that take action.
I have a deep intolerance for people who have to weigh up all the options, understand all their relative merits, consult all possible stakeholders and more often than not, do nothing. We see this everywhere: in corporations, in our government, and in the way most decisions get made. It’s not interesting, nor productive, nor useful, nor fulfilling.
Luckily, the whole world is not like that.
Most people don’t inherently believe that most decisions are, in fact, two-way doors. You can choose to walk through them and then walk back again. And when you are biased for action, that is exactly what you do. All the time.
In his 2016 letter to shareholders in Amazon – a fabled annual event – Jeff Bezos said: “Most decisions should probably be made with somewhere around 70 percent of the information you wish you had. If you wait for 90 percent, in most cases, you’re probably being slow. Plus, either way, you need to be good at quickly recognising and correcting bad decisions.”
Doing nothing is always costly. So is being in possession of 100 percent of the required data. Being wrong is sometimes costly and always informative, and only a small proportion of your actions take you through a one-way door.
In my opinion, you should only hold information-dependent decisions when the door you are walking through is one-way (irreversible). There are very few of those about, and generally in your life you should learn to recognise them.
Compared to status quo and existing players, startups always have less: people, money, brand/reputation, time (cashflow), expertise and many other valuable assets. Based on my experience, the only advantage startups have against incumbents is their ability to move – the speed and cadence of action.
If you need them written down, here are some reasons why this matters:
A bias for action does not mean acting impulsively. Failing to consider the direct and indirect consequences of your actions is not smart (nor cool). Action orientation is making a determination that you have sufficient information to make a decision and take the next concrete steps of progress. And much of the time, you already do.
In some ways, a craving for action is a philosophical matter – a life choice of sorts. I have had my time in well-paying corporate jobs where I became excellent at PowerPoint. I was effective at conveying ideas in documents and artefacts in boardrooms, but all I really wanted to do was go outside and play.
Despite the crazy hours, the relatively low pay and the frequency of failure I have to deal with (investments, people, theses, market entries etc), I remain deeply interested in working with founders and their startups. I love the purity of action – the bravery of it. Yes, I am intellectually curious, analytical and love game theory, but nothing compares to the feeling of doing.
There is a poem in Wellington, where I live, describing itself as the ‘city of action, the world headquarters of the verb’. It resonates with me; it’s why I live here. And it’s why I am so deeply enveloped by startups and their founders.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.